If I could be on the other side of the world, this is where I would be today: Blue House

Claire Bishop’s Situations is behind this group. I first came across her in response to Nicolas Bourriaud in October 2004. Here is what I have to say about that.

In her essay, “Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics”* Claire Bishop critiques and responds to Bourraid’s book Relational Aesthetics. Her main point is that Bourriaud focuses on artists that use “feel good” relationships. There are many artists that she highlights who create tension to highlight relationships and political situations. Bishop acknowledges the use of relations as a form employed in contemporary art, but calls for further criteria for critique. She highlights the fact that you do not need to have happy relationships to have a good work of relational art. She also questions the curator/critic role where the curator then writes about the work of the artist he shows, calling the curator the star.

I like her arguements here. She has a book called “Studio to Situation” where she developes these ideas further.

*Bishop, Claire. “Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics.” October (Fall 2004, No. 110): 51-79
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s